Maritime

Shaft alignment and propeller shaft aft bearing performance – recent trends call for action

Recent experience reflects concerns on propeller shaft aft bearing performance on some oil lubricated installations, e.g. ships with single stern tube bearing, during turning conditions involving hard-over steering angles in the upper speed range (MCR). This also coincides with evolving trends comprising of larger and heavier propellers operating at a lower RPM and different types of stern tube lubricants. This technical news aims to elaborate the basic logic, criteria and recommendations associated with propeller shaft aft bearing performance.

Downward bending moment
Figure 1 – Downward bending moment induced during a starboard turn: right handed propeller

Relevant for shipyards, suppliers, owners/managers, flag states and vetting agencies.

The basic concept and industry challenges 

DNV GL rules for shaft alignment (Jan. 2018, Pt.4 Ch.2 Sec.4) are formulated to achieve an acceptable distribution of load on the shaft bearings, and include a hydrodynamic lubrication criteria of the aft bearing. Due consideration is also made to accommodate the bending moment induced by the propeller during continuous operation. 

During extreme transient turning conditions in the upper speed range, exaggerated propeller bending moments are induced, leading to reduction in shaft-bearing contact area and an exponential increase in local pressures and thermal loading (see Figure 1). The expected nature of aft bearing lubrication under these conditions, i.e. a combination of a mixed and boundary type, poses a challenge to retain a hydrodynamic oil film of acceptable thickness. Most of the reported bearing damages (resulting from abrupt overheating) have been observed in the aft most part of the aft bearing, typically during a starboard turn on a right-handed propeller installation.

DNV GL solution

As a part of the continuous rule development process in accordance with the industry demand to cater to evolving design trends and experience, DNV GL has now 

  • revised the main class shaft alignment rules for single stern tube bearing installations, and
  • introduced new optional class notations, Shaft align(1) and Shaft align(2), for oil-lubricated propeller shaft installations.

Shaft align(1) is a basic cost-effective option intended for propulsion systems installed on vessels with conventional hull forms and which incorporates enhanced aft bearing performance during normal and turning operating conditions. 

  • Multi-sloped aft bearing is mandatory
  • Increased propeller bending moment ranging from -30 to +30% MCR torque included in the aft bearing loading criteria 
  • State-of-the-art measurement techniques for installation sighting (laser or equivalent) 
  • Means of warning against incomplete propeller immersion

Shaft align(2) is intended for propulsion systems requiring additional calculations to predict hydrodynamic propeller loads during turning conditions. Typical installations are vessels with non-conventional hull forms such as asymmetric stern and twin skeg.

  • Design-specific hydrodynamic propeller load spectrum and transient forces using CFD
  • FE analysis for transient aft bearing contact pressure and area
  • Hull deflections where applicable
  • Shaft align (1) requirements apply as the basic criteria 

Shaft-aft bearing contact area mapping A
Shaft-aft bearing contact area mapping B
Figure 2 – Shaft-aft bearing contact area mapping: single sloped (upper picture) versus double sloped aft bearing, the colored plots show the shaft-bearing gap

How does the solution make a difference?

The DNV GL shaft alignment class notations and revised main class rules for single stern tube bearing installations introduce additional focus on the impact of transient hydrodynamic propeller downward-acting bending moments, which are induced in turning conditions at MCR speed, on the aft most propeller shaft bearing. 

This is supported by a mandatory requirement for a multi-sloped aft bearing, coupled with an additional aft bearing lubrication evaluation criteria, with an increased bending moment acting downwards on the bearing (30% MCR torque). Compared to a single-sloped bearing, a multi-sloped design better assists in optimizing the shaft-to-bearing contact area and surface pressure in all operating conditions, considering the hydrodynamically-induced propeller bending moments (see Figure 2). 

For Shaft align(2), input from CFD-aided prediction of hydrodynamic propeller moments and forces acting on the aft bearing are used in conjunction with the FE analysis to evaluate the bearing surface pressure and contact area under turning conditions. DNV GL class guidelines linked to the rules provide guidance on the criteria to be followed in this regard. 

Recommendations

DNV GL recommends that operators consider enhanced propeller shaft bearing performance solutions.

The class notations Shaft Align(1) and (2) may be assigned at the newbuild phase or during service in conjunction with a propeller shaft withdrawal. This is particularly recommended for vessels undergoing retrofits or re-metalling of propeller shaft bearings during dry dock.   

References

Contact

For customers: 
DATE – Direct Access to Technical Experts via My Services on Veracity

Otherwise: 
Use our office locator to find the nearest DNV GL maritime office

17 June 2021

IMO update: Marine Environment Protection Committee – MEPC 76

The 76th session of the IMO’s Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC 76) was held remotely with a limited agenda from 10 to 17 June 2021. MEPC 76 adopted technical and operational measures to reduce carbon intensity of international shipping, taking effect from 2023. The measures include the Energy Efficiency Existing Ship Index (EEXI), the enhanced Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan (SEEMP) and the Carbon Intensity Indicator (CII) rating scheme.

  • Maritime
10 June 2021

PSC back to normal – update on Concentrated Inspection Campaigns (CICs)

Several serious incidents have initiated CICs from the major port states. The CIC on Stability in General by the Paris and Tokyo MoUs will be carried out from 1 September to 30 November 2021. The Black Sea, Indian Ocean, Mediterranean, Riyadh and Vina del Mar MoUs will join this initiative, whereby the Caribbean MoU, US Coast Guard and AMSA have their own CIC or local inspection campaigns. This PSC news summarizes ongoing and upcoming CICs.

  • Maritime
14 May 2021

IMO Maritime Safety Committee (MSC 103)

The 103rd session of the IMO’s Maritime Safety Committee (MSC) was held remotely from 5 to 14 May. The agenda ranged from the humanitarian crew change crisis to safety regulations for unmanned ships. With 200,000 seafarers still affected by the pandemic, it was recognized that the vaccination of seafarers is key to overcoming the crisis. A new goal-based IMO instrument was found to be the best way to safely introduce autonomous ships into the IMO regulatory framework, concluding the MSC review of existing instruments for this purpose.

  • Maritime
27 April 2021

IMO Sub-Committee on Navigation, Communications, Search & Rescue

The 8th session of the IMO’s Sub-Committee on Navigation, Communications and Search and Rescue (NCSR) was held remotely from 19 to 23 April 2021. The session finalized the work on the modernization of the requirements for the global maritime distress and safety system, with the aim to adapt to modern communication systems and remove carriage requirements for obsolete systems. It was also decided to recommend recognition of the Japanese Quasi-Zenith Satellite System as a component of the worldwide radio navigation system.

  • Maritime
View all