Maritime

Sulphur Cap 2020 – carriage of non-compliant fuel due to delays in scrubber installation

The COVID-19 outbreak has resulted in delays to retrofit installations of exhaust gas cleaning systems (EGCS) – or scrubbers. This news gives guidance to owners/operators who due to a delay in the installation of an EGCS, now have non-compliant fuel on board.

Technical Regulatory News No 08, 2020 - Statutory

Relevant for ship owners and managers, yards, suppliers, design offices as well as flag states.

From 1 March 2020, high-sulphur fuel oil (HSFO) cannot be carried in the fuel oil tanks unless the vessel is fitted with an ECGS or other approved equivalent arrangement. However due to the COVID19 crisis, there are some vessels where the installation of the EGCS was not completed before the March deadline as planned, and still have HSFO in their bunker tanks.

There is no general procedure in place how to deal with ships, which are currently in dry dock for installation of EGCS, having non-compliant fuel oil on board. The IMO does not consider COVID-19 to fall under force majeure. In addition, the “unforeseen delay” clause in MARPOL only applies to new buildings and not alterations/conversions, see also Circular Letter No.4204/Add.7.

This means that vessels without an approved EGCS which are carrying non-compliant fuel exceeding 0.50% Sulphur are in breach of MARPOL Annex VI. Vessels which are not able to de-bunker will need to find a solution acceptable to PSC and the flag. In such cases, MEPC.1/Circ.881 GUIDANCE FOR PORT STATE CONTROL ON CONTINGENCY MEASURES FOR ADDRESSING NON-COMPLIANT FUEL OIL applies.

If your ship is in this situation, DNV GL recommends that you are proactive, transparent and cooperative with authorities. Enforcement falls to the port state, with the guidance stating that “the port State, the flag state and the ship should work together to agree on the most appropriate solution to address the non-compliant fuel.” This may imply de-bunkering or retaining the fuel on board.

In dealing with the bunker, PSC must evaluate and decide on “managing the non-compliant fuel oil in accordance with a method acceptable to the port state”. DNV GL’s advice is, in order to ensure no emissions to air beyond what is acceptable by MARPOL, to seal off the inlet and outlet valves of the tank containing the non-compliant fuel, noting the seal numbers and tank sounding in the oil record book (ORB) under “Additional operational procedures and general remarks”, all witnessed and endorsed by a DNV GL surveyor.

Prior to the de-bunkering or after completing the scrubber installation the same would apply, breaking of the seal should be witnessed and the ORB endorsed accordingly and any receipt for delivered fuel should be filed on board in the ORB. This should be followed up with a Condition of Authority, or a short term IAPP, depending on flag instructions.

Recommendations

If your vessel has HSFO on board due to a delay in EGCS installation, it is vitally important to proactively contact PSC and inform them of the situation. Be transparent and cooperative to implement any required contingency measures with the acceptance of PSC and the flag.

References

Contact

  • For customer: DATE – Direct Access to Technical Experts via My Services on Veracity 
  • Otherwise: Use our office locator to find the nearest DNV GL office.
29 November 2021

IMO update: Marine Environment Protection Committee – MEPC 77

The 77th session of the IMO’s Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC 77) was held remotely from 22 to 26 November 2021. Highlights include recognition of the need to strengthen the ambitions in the IMO GHG Strategy, adoption of a resolution urging for the use of distillates or other cleaner fuels or technologies to reduce emission of black carbon in or near the Arctic, and revised guidelines on exhaust gas cleaning systems.

  • Maritime
08 November 2021

Anchor losses are on a negative trend – How to improve

There has been a negative trend in the loss of anchors and chains in recent years. The safety, environmental and financial consequences can be severe, and port authorities may hold a vessel responsible for all costs caused by a lost anchor for an unlimited period of time. This technical news focuses on operational challenges, current rules and practices, awareness, lesson learned, and recommendations related to anchor equipment damages/losses.

  • Maritime
11 October 2021

IMO Maritime Safety Committee (MSC 104)

The 104th session of the IMO’s Maritime Safety Committee (MSC) was held remotely from 4 to 8 October. The requirements for watertight doors on cargo ships were harmonized, and the Japanese Quasi-Zenith Satellite System was recognized for the provision of position, navigation, and timing services. The MSC also initiated the development of a goal-based instrument for autonomous ships, and the development of guidance for remote surveys and audits.

  • Maritime
View all